LIVE · refreshes every 20 min

updated Oct 20, 12:43 UTC

← 110010.art all stories

r/LocalLLaMA ·2h ago

Qwen3.8-FlashNext vs Qwen3.8-27B tool calling issues

Read the original at www.reddit.com→

I've been using the 27B series for a while now. It's so good, I don't even use a custom chat template and barely ever saw tool call failures. My latest model & engine of choice were ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27b-NVFP4...

Coverage timeline

Oct 20, 10:43 UTC r/LocalLLaMA lead source Qwen3.8-FlashNext vs Qwen3.8-27B tool calling issues

Related stories

Used HP Z640 with 2x E5-2680 v4, 64GB ECC, and Quadro M6000; plan to add two 3060s for Qwen 3.8 Flash Next on Strata, llama.cpp, and PyTorch workloads under Ubuntu.

r/LocalLLaMA · 4h ago · source ↗

Open-source AI leaderboard shows the best models your machine can run locally, with rank and run commands for each model

r/LocalLLaMA · 8d ago · source ↗

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next significantly speeds up results and improves precision

r/LocalLLaMA · 1h ago · source ↗

Improve Qwen3.8-27b low quant accuracy with a prefiller model streaming from SSD

r/LocalLLaMA · 2h ago · source ↗

ISTA-DASLab updates Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-Coder-GGUF; changes in retained experts with no retained weights modified and multilingual capabilities not preserved

r/LocalLLaMA · 21h ago · source ↗