Is a second local LLM a security boundary or just another probabilistic opinion?
Read the original at old.reddit.com→I keep seeing the same security architecture proposed for local agents: user input → main model → guard model → tool execution It looks clean in a diagram. I’m not convinced it creates a reliable security boundary....
Original headline: "Is a second local LLM actually a security boundary, or just another probabilistic opinion?"
Coverage timeline
- Jul 30, 09:32 UTC r/LocalLLaMA lead source Is a second local LLM actually a security boundary, or just another probabilistic opinion?