Machine-extracted statutory logic shows inter-extractor disagreement on Missouri statutes at 0.43 false negatives; authors build a passive survival certificate for the Duquenne-Guigues implication basis
Read the original at arxiv.org→arXiv:2609.01741v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Statutes are increasingly parsed by machines before people read them, and the parsers disagree: on Missouri's statutes, two independently written extractors diverge on...
Original headline: "When Can a Machine Trust a Statute? A Survival Certificate for Machine-Extracted Legal Logic"
Coverage timeline
- Sep 3, 04:00 UTC arXiv cs.AI lead source When Can a Machine Trust a Statute? A Survival Certificate for Machine-Extracted Legal Logic