AI leaderboards fail to serve the Global South due to governance and design gaps, exemplified by India’s IndicSUPERB, MILU, and LAHAJA benchmarks; a case study argues institutional design, not data, is the barrier.
Read the original at arxiv.org→arXiv:2608.18117v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This position paper argues that AI leaderboards are structurally ill-suited to serving the Global South because they lack independent governance, conflict-of-interest...
Original headline: "Position: AI Leaderboards Are Underserving the Global South: A Case Study from India"
Coverage timeline
- Aug 20, 04:00 UTC arXiv cs.AI lead source Position: AI Leaderboards Are Underserving the Global South: A Case Study from India