Consistency is not validity: self-rewarded moral argumentation makes language models decisive but pliable
Read the original at arxiv.org→arXiv:2610.30349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs are increasingly consulted for moral judgment. We aim to improve performance on such tasks by rewarding good arguments, on the premise that arguing well increases...
Original headline: "Consistency Is Not Validity: Self-Rewarded Moral Argumentation Makes Language Models Decisive but Pliable"
Coverage timeline
- Oct 23, 04:00 UTC arXiv cs.CL lead source Consistency Is Not Validity: Self-Rewarded Moral Argumentation Makes Language Models Decisive but Pliable